YOUR RESEARCHCayman RJ09GHU - history? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Does anyone know about this car? I've been prevaricating for most of the summer and this has been sitting on the forecourt for quite a while: http://www.barnsidemotors.co.uk/2009-Porsche-Cayma... Looks OK so not sure why it has not sold already (some might not like the 17" wheels, but they'd be good for winters...)
I have looked at this Cayman 2.9 , three service stamps one which one is a main dealer. Looks OK , its missing the rear cargo net no rear parking sensors. Dealer not that keen to sell in my opinion he would knock £500.00 off. I think the 60 plate at Northway my be a better buy. Good luck.
Been for sale as long as I can remember!
Thanks for the replies. Great first post, welcome to PH, I'll have a look at the one you mentioned too.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
