Hey all, Just picked up my first 911 a week ago, a 2003 4S Coupe 6mt with about 59,000 miles on it. Loving it so far, but I honestly am disappointed with the ride quality, and I seem to be able to find a number of other threads that say the same thing (confirmation bias?). Anyways, I am all about a firm and taught ride, but what I don't like is jarring. My car feels great in terms of spring rate and rebound, I have no bouncing what-so-ever. However I really feel like they did a poor job with the compression on these cars. It doesn't feel like the struts are absorbing anything at all on un-smooth pavement. Fortunately, there are a few options from OEM to hardcore and everything in between. I think the H&R streets are the product I'd like to try. PSS10s would be nice, but I am not sure I can justify the $1k cost over the H&Rs. Anyways, here's my question: I have a cup exhaust with no mufflers, no rear seats and no sub, rear end is probably about 70lbs lighter than stock Front has AWD removed, light battery and no spare/ tools, probably close to 150lbs lighter than stock I'd bet my car is a lot closer to C2 weight than to stock 4s weight, so would I be better off with C2 spring rates? Especially since I live on crappy-*** upstate new york roads. Anyone have any thoughts on this? It does seem like the C2, 4/4S, and turbos all have different spring heights and rates, so I wonder if the C2 ones would be more appropriate.
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHC2 H&R Street Coils on "lightened" 4s?
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 1 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
1 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
