This article made me think. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/a...&pagewanted=2&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1335032824-D qWoTE9/2VS8NAmMFRPkg&pagewanted=all "Computers mediate nearly all of the new 911’s driving experience. But Porsche has devised algorithms that always keep the driver feeling involved and excited. Maybe it doesn’t matter whether what the driver feels is a genuine mechanical sensation or an electronic simulation. This is a car that delivers unparalleled immediacy in its reflexes while retaining a supple ride for everyday use. The big tires can roar a bit on some surfaces, but there’s never been a better all-round sports car." A lot of people ridicule the Nissan GTR as the computer driving the car with the driver along for a ride. What if the new 991/981 cars offer a similar level of computer control except their computer is smarter in terms of fooling you into thinking you are in control when you are not? Which is worse? An honest computer or a cunning one?
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDriving experience = computer synthesized
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T020439Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
6 figure Nissan. Enough said.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.