GT Purely Porsche November 2005 p. 58 I couldn't get near Porsche's tall ex-rally star frontman last night. Too many German speakers crowding around him. Bad news because while attending a Porsche launch and not talking to Walter Rohrl is almost as bad as not driving the car. So there I was standing outside the dining room at breakfast the next morning with pad and pen in hand like some teenager outside a McFly concert. Bingo, job sorted. Breakfast with Walter at the quiet end of the table. Rohrl is one of us. He can't help himself. He's passionate about driving; passionate about Porsche. Best of all he's a purist. He recently bought an Eighties Carrera because he wanted to own a car that isn't full of electronics and that is still possible to repair at home. That passion makes it difficult for Rohrl to hide his beliefs and opinions behind the company front. He's fairly discreet, but it's pretty obvious that for him the Cayman is exactly the right car for Porsche to be making. For a professional driver who throughout his career has concentrated on extracting as much performance out of a car as possible, the concept of holding a vehicle back for marketing reasons is anathema to Rohrl. Porsche has repeatedly said that the 911 will always be the company's flagship and that even the 911 at the bottom of the range will outperform other models. That'll require pinning back the Cayman's performance. A situation that Rohrl obviously finds disturbing if not criminal. You get the impression that it wouldn't take too many matchsticks under his fingernails for Rohrl to come out with it and proclaim that there's no point in buying a 911 now that we have the Cayman S. Especially when Porsche sets to and builds some lightweight and truly focused versions of the Cayman. No doubt Walter Rohrl knows exactly what's coming. Unfortunately, for details of that, torture would be required. http://www.gtpurelyporsche.com/back-issues.htm#november The Future is… Cayman S shaped? - Porsche’s new mid-engined coupé signifies the end of the most remarkable recovery in automotive history. But just how good is the company’s new car? December 2005 GT Purely Porsche Edited by - mpollard on 12/12/2005 7:13:41 PM
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBreakfast with Walter - and do you now need a 911?
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
mpollard, Again thanks for doing the finding! That is interesting, wouldn't like to have an hour with Rohrl and see what you could extract from him! Aloha Russ
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
