POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
996 posts!
6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHYeay !
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- 911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
POST 2Original post
Nah... I reckon you edited it! :eh!:
POST 3Original post
You must have agonised over post number 997 :wink:
POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
Well, as I type I am on post 1017, which by virtue of one number almost always coming after another number one fewer (if an integer), reducio ad absurdum, I also posted, erm, post 996! Having said that, I did a screen shot of the 996th post immediately it was submitted and added as an attachment. (which was an edit) But the actual post of "Yeay! 996 posts!" was my 996th post (without screen shot it makes little sense, as it is a dynamic counter). Any way, is it sad I have counted down the days since I missed out on celebrating the ideal post count of 911?
POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
Well, I did agonise over whether to look even sadder and submit the same sort of thread in the 997 camp. But thought that looked a little thread tart. Besides, who wants to celebrate a 997? As far as I know, the 996 was the first kettle and the first GT3. I can't remember the second, history seldom records the losers. ;-)
POST 6Original post
:hand:
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.