POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
This may be a stupid question, but do you-all believe that reps or officials from PCNA and PAG monitor Rennlist?
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMonitoring Rennlist?
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
POST 2Original post
of course...
POST 3Original post
If they had any sense they would. Over the course of a year it's probably worth $0.5MM in market research costs. They would also be smart to "plant" a Rennlist Member to ask critical questions from time-to-time. Frankly I would be more worried if they WEREN'T monitoring Rennlist and other fora...
POST 4Original post
I definately think it would be useful for them in terms of market research, keeping the pulse of the enthusiasts etc. ESPECIALLY in the case of Porsche which so heavily relies on enthusiasts' business. What I have wondered about and maybe this is what Don was eluding to...I wonder if they could hold any of the information we discuss against us when it comes time for warranty etc.?!
POST 5Original post
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">What I have wondered about and maybe this is what Don was eluding to...I wonder if they could hold any of the information we discuss against us when it comes time for warranty etc.?! </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">I have heard that a warranty claim was denied due to dealer monitoring a forum and owner on that forum discussing problems possibly being caused by chip or aftermarktet parts. Diffent brand and different board.
POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
I love all Porsches past and present; I think every model year was perfect; I love all the folks at PAG and PCNA from the top executive to the guy who drives the finished cars to the PAG parking lot; I love every Porsche Dealer from coast to coast and throughout the world; and I even loved Fred Schwab! <img border="0" alt="[thumbsup]" title="" src="graemlins/bigok.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[icon501]" title="" src="graemlins/icon501.gif" />
POST 7Original post
Let's ask -- 'Porsche' are you out there? Sales, Marketing, Product Development, Customer Service? RMS Guy? No way he will answer! Anyone? Hello?'
POST 8Original post
Oh a Sch wab lover tch tch He's out now you need to be a Ford Lover!!!!!
POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
IDranon, I knew that! I was just trying to be a smart-a*s, 'cause no one really liked him.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.