YOUR RESEARCHStock Fluid better than SuperBlue?
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T150039Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Check out this thread: http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=1042539#post1042539 K-man-S also mentioned that he just heard the same thing, just the other day, after I switched to SuperBlue. If this is the case, would it be best to switch back to stock after 1 or 2 track days/a-x events?
What I mentioned was what someone told me that the boiling points of the stock fluid are actually better than superblue but not as good as motul. I have no idea how the sponge factor of each compares.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
