POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
Big Brother? http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Alcohol-Detectors-Could-Come-Standard-With-a-New-Car-117777338.html?dr
986ForumOriginal source
Calif Law to Require Alcohol Detectors on New Cars - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners
Add to repair workspace
8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCalif Law to Require Alcohol Detectors on New Cars - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- 986Forum: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T220748Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
POST 2Original post
I haven't had a drink of alcohol in 25 years. Yet, Big Brother wants me to pay for a breathalyzer on my new car. What's next? It's a slippery slope.
POST 3Original post
I'd rather that money go toward teaching new drivers how to be a better, smarter driver. Invest on the front end, don't try to fix it after the fact.
POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
Will drivers just buy older cars without this feature? LOL
POST 5Original post
That was my first thought. My second thought is that I am never renting a car in CA if this goes through - Those devices would be dirtier than a $2 hooker.
POST 6Original post
Well, the lawmakers need something to distract them from, well, their jobs.
POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
You mean like reducing the state budget deficit and saving the state from bankruptcy.
POST 8Original post
IMO, this does nothing. As a former heathcare provider, MANY were the times that patients confided in me they had mixed their meds and did so frequently. One lady, was so fearful of the doctor, she took 2 klonopines and a codeine, I asked who is driving you home? ME It doesn't matter anyhow, in a world with emerging technologies for cars to judge distances between themselves it's not hard to see the end game. Soon, you won't be "driving" at all, expect maybe in special parks. Everything will be automated, then people can text without killing other people trying to get a loaf of bread.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.