YOUR RESEARCHConfigurator Pricing - 981 - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T105141Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all Has anyone else noticed that the 2.7 Boxster and Cayman are almost identically priced on the configurator for base spec? £39,553 for the Boxster £39,694 for the Cayman Seem to have gotten a bit addicted to the configurator recently and am close to enquiring around how much difference it would be to trade in my 987.2 for a 981.
Go for it mate, it's a stunning car, 6 months and can't stop being astonished by overall experience.
giltranator said: Hi all Has anyone else noticed that the 2.7 Boxster and Cayman are almost identically priced on the configurator for base spec? £39,553 for the Boxster £39,694 for the Cayman Seem to have gotten a bit addicted to the configurator recently and am close to enquiring around how much difference it would be to trade in my 987.2 for a 981. Cayman S is still £1000 more than the Boxster S. I've never understood why Porsche have tried to "position" the Cayman "above" the Boxster - surely the Boxster's roof costs a lot more to produce than the Cayman's.
bcr5784 said: giltranator said: Hi all Has anyone else noticed that the 2.7 Boxster and Cayman are almost identically priced on the configurator for base spec? £39,553 for the Boxster £39,694 for the Cayman Seem to have gotten a bit addicted to the configurator recently and am close to enquiring around how much difference it would be to trade in my 987.2 for a 981. Cayman S is still £1000 more than the Boxster S. I've never understood why Porsche have tried to "position" the Cayman "above" the Boxster - surely the Boxster's roof costs a lot more to produce than the Cayman's. Therefore more profit on the Cayman = clever Porsche.
Miopyk said: Therefore more profit on the Cayman = clever Porsche. Or less profit on the Boxster = silly Porcshe. Depends on whether they sell more Boxsters or Caymans. Most other car makers charge more for cabs because they cost them more and (presumably) the market will stand it.
Miopyk said: Therefore more profit on the Cayman = clever Porsche. Or less profit on the Boxster = silly Porcshe. Depends on whether they sell more Boxsters or Caymans. Most other car makers charge more for cabs because they cost them more and (presumably) the market will stand it.
bcr5784 said: Miopyk said: Therefore more profit on the Cayman = clever Porsche. Or less profit on the Boxster = silly Porcshe. Depends on whether they sell more Boxsters or Caymans. Most other car makers charge more for cabs because they cost them more and (presumably) the market will stand it. If it was any other manufacturer I'd probably agree but based on the apparent margins Porsche make I think clever is the more likely scenario.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
