So I'm driving some back roads last night and I see a new Roadster a couple cars in front of me. I'm driving my family in our suv. I couldn't recognize it exactly but I finally conclude it's a 'F' type Jag. My son agrees I am absolutely dumbfound that the driver hits the brakes before each twist in the road. Its a 45 mph road and they slow down each time to 35 to take the turn. I'm shaking my head Finally no more cars between me and the 'F' Type. The driver continues to cautiously enter every turn like an overloaded Semi. We finally meet at a stop sign and Oh S!@% it's a Boxster S. Man do I feel like a Porsche Know-nothing. I'm thinking it's a 718 because from behind with those very narrow tail lights, it looks just like the Jag I think that driver bought a Badge, not a sports car I don't really care that I don't know the new Porsche's, I'm just not very interested in them but I was kinda taken back My Family certainly enjoyed my ignorance
Don't know what a new Porcshe looks like - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners
Add to repair workspace
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDon't know what a new Porcshe looks like - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- 986Forum: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So whens the last time you went off-roading with your SUV?
Maybe he was practicing 'slow in, fast out'? As annoying as that might have been, what would we be saying about him if he went in at 75 and wadded up his nice new sports car in the ditch? That would be far more embarrassing (and costly). There's plenty of those guys on YT. I think the F Types are far sexier than the 981 / 718s. IF I was looking for a new car, I would certainly look at the F. The current 981 Spyder would be in the mix too.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.