YOUR RESEARCHPorsche cayman 2.7 vs 2.9 - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello PH'ers, I just sold my Mini cooper and planning to buy a porsche cayman 987 in 2016. Which one is the best option a 2.9 or 2.7, any specific problems associated? I cannot buy a cayman s since I live in Belgiun an the yearly tax we have to pay for bigger engines is ridiculuous.
I started a thread on the same recently, this may help! http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
So you bought an 2,9, satisfied? Personally I prefer the 2.9, cabin&exterior looks nicer and 2.9 engine is probally more robust. Do you have a stick or pdk?
I haven't made a purchase yet, but think the 2.9 is winning for me. Will cost a bit more but I will appreciate the extra power, better interior more I think.
I'd go for the 2.9. Newer and better engine. Better styling too.
I'm also a little bit afraid that i doesn't have enough torque for my taste. A few years ago we had a Boxster 2.5 from 1998, and the engine was doing nothing below 4000rpm and at 6500rpm it was all over.
V800MJH said: I'd go for the 2.9. Newer and better engine. Better styling too. I thought the latest cars had a 2.7? SS7
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
