YOUR RESEARCHInteresting information about the ill-fated 989
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T172408Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I was trying to find a decent picture of the 989 and came across this interesting bit of information. The pictures are terrible and I know there are are very clear pics somewhere. The comments about the headlight and taillight assemblies I thought were interesting. <a href="http://www.flat-6.net/view.php?model=989&sel=989&tab=oview" target="_blank">989 information</a>
Good piece of detective work, Don! Certainly something that Mulder & Scully should be investigating.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
