YOUR RESEARCHdo you prefer rennlist or funcars on line?
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
i generally find more thoughtful answers on rennlist but frequently see more traffic on fun cars. to have viken and loren here as final authorities on all technical matters is priceless! <img src="graemlins/bigok.gif" border="0" alt="[thumbsup]" /> what do you think? i've noticed many of us on both lists <img src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" />
hmm..I've never heard of funcars online... so Rennlist it is! <img src="graemlins/bigok.gif" border="0" alt="[thumbsup]" />
I like both. I see rennlist as a more serious site strictly for information. In that these forums are building a searchable archive. CFG seems a bit more playful and it seems people are adpt to post things that are a bit more off topic (maybe that's just me ). I agree having people like Loren, Viken, NASA Pete, Don, and everyone else is priceless. It's a great thing to be able to exchange information so easily and I'm enjoying my car much more because of it. <img src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" /> <img src="graemlins/drink.gif" border="0" alt="[cherrsagai]" />
Another choice is RennTeam: <a href="http://www.rennteam.com/" target="_blank">RennTeam</a> Especially useful on the 996 Turbo. S.
I just love rennlist, I tried fun cars on-line but I prefer rennlist much more. The info here is the best there is
rennlist>rennteam>fcol
I spend most of time on rennlist but do look at CFG's Funcarsonline as well. Rennlist offers many different makes of Porsche's which I like to jump around to and tech info is none better. Regards. Mike
i think the same people are on all of them ...?? call it a competitive market!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
