POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
This seems like a nice one, anyone on here? https://www.pistonheads.com/classif...---------------2000/8466785#/home&gid=1&pid=8
10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNice turbo
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 10 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- 911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T120458Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
POST 2Original post
Does look nice :thumbs:
POST 3Original post
Indeed it does.. sensible money too given colour and mileage :thumb:
POST 4Original post
But what's that nonsense about the early ones being particularly collectible? Presumably on the basis of weight saving of not having a glovebox!
POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
I have always wonder why did they not have glovebox in the first gen? What was Porsche reason for this?
POST 6Original post
Probably because Porsche at the time were so skint that it was a choice between developing a glovebox and developing a decent cooling system for the NA 996 engine. :wack:
POST 7Original post
That would make sense if the first cars had a glovebox. MC
POST 8Original post
:floor: Maybe the introduction of a glovebox was by way of an apology... Somewhere to store the scored cylinder
POST 9Original post
Complete nonsense, when I was looking it was widely acknowledged the 02+ facelift held a premium. Not sure if this still stands but the pre-02 certainly don't hold more value! That said are the 01 backwards cars cheaper on tax? :?:
POST 10Original post
nice car at a good price imo - can't see the year making much difference now, and I've managed to live without a glovebox for 5 years so it can't be that bad
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.