fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Open letter to RL 996 Forum members and mods...

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
2 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHOpen letter to RL 996 Forum members and mods...

1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

Insufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.

1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Folks: My goal here at RL has always been to contribute to the community, not to detract from it. For quite a while, healthy doses of humor and sarcasm seemed welcome...or at least tolerated. When it became clear that the amount of participation in certain non-technical threads had become an overt annoyance to RL moderators, I started a new 996-specific site to provide a new outlet for the camaraderie I felt was lost when the bulk of those more nonsensical threads were closed. Several RL members have also subscribed to the new site, resulting in some murmuring that perhaps it is nothing more than a hangout for RL-bashers. This isn't the case, and it's not the point of the site. My list of rules and regulations is currently one item long; that item is "Don't be a d*ck." I may not have specific rules about, for example, creating multiple logins to troll other members - but that counts as d*ckish, and we'll moderate accordingly if we see it happening. I don't want people crapping in my sandbox, and I won't become the base of operations for people who want to cause problems here. As one of the most annoying fixtures in Rennlist's 996 Forum horseplay, I enjoy the 996-centric lunacy; I'd far rather participate than act as the Internet thought police. I believe that everyone who has joined my new site feels the same way. However, I don't want that ridiculous little site to detract from any RL user's experience. If anyone here - member or moderator - has a specific concern, please PM me about it. I'm locking this upon posting because I don't want this to devolve into a crap fest. Thanks for all the good times and great information over the past several years. I will still be contributing here - but hopefully in a way less likely to give any the RL mods unexpected blood pressure spikes. -5chn3ll

POST 2Original post

maybe you should go clean up your own "good week" thread before claiming saint hood. And FWIW, I wish you good times with your forum.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.