fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Compression Readings

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHCompression Readings

1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

Insufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi all Just curious to know what the "average" range is on individual cylinder compression readings. In PSI if possible...! AT

POST 2Original post

https://rennlist.com/forums/964-foru...mpression.html https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...-question.html

POST 3Original post

G'day Timlin. The unit type is not noted on my report, but I'm fairly sure it's PSI. It was as follows in April of 2016: #1: 205 #2: 200 #3: 210 #4: 200 #5: 200 #6: 205 The numbers seem high after looking at others but well within 10% variance. Hope this is helpful to you.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thank you very much - just what I was after!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.