From another thread...... BlackCab996, I thought I'd stir up a little ****. I wanted to see if you're really serious about smashing your computer screen. Here's "one more" thread about RMS paranoia. If you respond to this message, I'll know you were bluffing. If you weren't bluffing, you wouldn't have been able to read this far into my message as your screen would be completely smashed by now and you wouldn't bee able 2 respond. I must admit, I like being a smart-*** every so often.
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHRMS paranoia
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T181445Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Here is a video of Blackcab996, living up to his promise. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...803&q=computer
Too f**king funny! I was laughing my a$$ off as I read this!
Well, you made me smash my laptop - now I have to write from my desktop. Hmmm - I seem to buy a new laptop every two or three years as technology improves, and I'll bet a lot of people do the same. Let's see, that costs around the same as an RMS replacement. I wonder if I should start feeling paranoia about technology becoming obsolete, as upgrading cell phones, computers, kitchen appliances, etc. eats up way more money than most of us will ever spend on RMS replacements.
Great video, by the way!!!
Ouch... Security surveilance video of BlackCab996 at work at the time he logged into rennlist indicate that he isn't too happy about this thread. http://www.ebaumsworld.com/badday.html Keith
Later he returned and here is the actual footage of what blackcab996 did to his screen after he read the thread. Afterwards he switched to his laptop. http://www.fotosearch.com/TME726/726-14/
Hey BlackCab996, if you were to buy a new 911 every 2 or 3 years along with your new laptop you wouldn't care about RMS (okay, maybe every 1 or 2 years ;-) '02 C2, silver/black, driven daily - rain, snow or shine
Realist D. - I agree - can you talk to my wife for me?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
