I'm an east coast resident and recently started a new job (commuting every couple of weeks) in the San Diego area and moved my 03 C4S there as a daily driver to/from work. The perfect car for the nicest climate in the U.S. Anyway, I had always wanted to see the famous Palomar Observatory, home of the equally famous 200-inch Hale Telescope (commissioned in 1949 and the largest telescope in the world for 45 years). The observatory is on a peak at around 5600 ft, accessed by a couple of roads from the east, west, and south. I had done enough advance research to know that the southern road to the peak was 7 miles and very scenic. What I didn't appreciate until I started up was just how fast, technical, and wild a drive it was. In 7 miles, I climbed over 4000 ft (about a 10% grade) and experienced a series of 180 degree, decreasing radius switchbacks. Most of it in 2nd car in the short straights and the corners. What I also experienced was a large number of bikers who apparently spend their weekends honing the horizontal-planted-knee cornering skills around the tight corners. I held my own with many of these guys but a few of them were incredibly quick and, of course, they knew the road. If the ride up was fun, the ride down was downright white-knuckled. I highly recommend this to anyone in the greater San Diego area. You should head out early to avoid any car traffic (although the small number of cars I encountered were good about pulling over). Don't worry about getting in the way of the bikers because most of them with smoke you anyways. Here's a picture of my car (in my driveway, sorry, I didn't take a picture at the summit) and the observatory. Enjoy it if you do it.
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhat a ride!
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T172408Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Yup the torque of the 996 engine makes up hill cornering so much fun.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
