Hi all, Just wanted to share a few thoughts from driving my friend's Spyder...it's LOTS of fun and revs freely and drive much lighter than I expected, both weight as as well as steering. The looks are sexy and the engine sound is terrific(in the higher RPMs). That said, it was VERY difficult getting in/out of the car w/ the bucket seats and definitely not recommended for daily driving. The ride quality was actually quite nice w/ the 19" wheels, and surprisingly softer/more comfortable than my C4S(w/ PSS 9 shocks and 18" wheels). In addition, the clutch and shifter were both buttery soft, though some may complain that it's almost Honda like(is that a complement). The brakes are similar in size to my C4S, but they feel more power-assisted. Well, now back to my C4S. It's just a totally different car - it drives heavier/stiffer, and actually felt a bit more solid. The clutch and short shifter almost felt "old school" compared with the Spyder. However, I really like the stronger torque and roar from my engine sound vs. the Spyder. At the end of the day, I'd LOVE the have the Spyder as well...but given the price difference and pros/cons between the two cars, I would not consider paying another $25k+ to trade...and I LOVE my C4S. P.S. I think the shift in chassis is probably similar to when I went from my 1989 Carrera Cab to the 996 C4S...modern engineering is terrific, but steering feel of old school sometimes is also important, and for me, I like it more. PL
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 C4S vs 2011 Boxster Spyder
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
IMO, Porsche's 986 & 987 mid-engine modern cars (Cayman & Boxster) are the ultimate driving/handling cars (save for GT3s and similar), but they are not the all-around cruisers that 996s are. From my experience, the 996 does everything well including attacking the curves, track driving, and daily driving. The Cayman/Boxster, especially the R and Spyder models, are more geared toward track and DE duty than the 996 line is in general, and in that they do a few things better than 996s. But, they are not quite the same car for comfort/convenience and all-day cruising that the 996 is. I truly enjoyed my 996 C4 and may own another 996 someday, but my first modern Porsche was my Cayman S and it has held my affection better and longer than any Porsche I have ever had. I don't use a Porsche for daily driving or driving across the country, so at this point the only 996 that would tempt me to trade the Cayman is a 996/997 GT3. 996/997 vs 986/987 is all about what you're looking for in a Porsche. It's nice to have choices.....
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
