Credit to Agent Jester for the "continued" concept after the "$8,500 Porsche" thread was locked. Maybe this will get Schnelly's attention.
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGood Week in the 996 Forum . . . (continued)
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I predict this will be more RotJ than ESB. Sequels are rarely as good as the original.
Well, maybe we'll lock this one as soon as Schnelly comes around. BTW, I have twice as many posts in this thread than you.
Meh you're just upset that you can't hang with the big boys in the other thread. You only hold the 4th spot there because DTM is too drunk to post frequently and/or is too busy fondling his Miata.
Should this thread go so long, you'll lose the top spot by the end of page 2.
Oh look, you just did actually.
Ok, that's it.
This is my thread.
I am the top dog.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
