Sent my helmet out for painting 5 weeks ago and it just came back. It is an OMP Toursimo sedan helmet. Needless to say, the results exceeded any expectation I could have had. Brad and the guys at Bullseye Visual are amazing. Here are some pics: <a href="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/rennlist_leftside2.jpg" target="_blank">http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/rennlist_leftside2.jpg</a> <a href="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/rennlist_rightside.jpg" target="_blank">http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/rennlist_rightside.jpg</a> <a href="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/rennlist_top.jpg" target="_blank">http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/rennlist_top.jpg</a> <a href="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/rennlist_rear.jpg" target="_blank">http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/rennlist_rear.jpg</a> BTW, Yes my wife tells me all the time that I really need to grow up...it's on my list.
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHhelmet back from airbrushing!
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Great design work.. amaaaaaazing!! Tell your wife she's not alone in this world! Waz
Fantastic look! Gee, I wonder how much you have to pay for copyright rights to all those cartoons! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />
Love it! Thanks for sharing.
Don, Thanks for pointing that out to me. Being an engineer, I never think about this stuff;-) I should have put something on the helmet like at the end of movies: "The events/characters depicted on this helmet are fictional. Any resemblance to any cartoons, living or deceased, is purely coincidental" Any lawyers on the board want to help me out of this?
Hey Itc or should I say "Ren", "It looks reeally nice fast friend..." ;-)
There's no copyright infringement here, it's public domain material, and he's not selling for a profit, it's his own personal helmet. Now, the point could be made that the artist did a little infringing, but also not true. The artist charged a flat fee to paint the helmet, be it Ren and Stimpy, Coyote/RoadRunner, Stars and Bars, a Tampax ad or grey primer. Now, if he and the artist got together and started knocking these out in production and selling em at a profit, then you can be sure the lawyers at Warner Bros and Spumco would be hunting em down like the dogs they are.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.