What do you think guys
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHThis is My 2002 996tt
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T172408Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
More pictures pls! Wael 996C299
Try uploading the picture again. fadz-C4S/02 <img src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" />
Here we are the pic from 996_2002 :
996-2002, if you re-write the link and eliminate the space between the "g" in jpg and [/img] the link might work. no: jpg [/img] ok: jpg[/img] That's assuming the rest of the link is correct tho..
That's a good one, a black ghost, is it a Turbo or a GT? fadz-C4S/02
beautiful! congrats.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
