POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
Was recently perusing some of the articles at pedrosgarage.com In one article he notes: I've heard of a lot...but never this. Anyone else hear of this or is this just more fantasy piled on the engine?
13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHarmonic vibration at 3,000rpm -- BS?
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 13 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T042512Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
POST 2Original post
Odd, I purposely keep my engines at 3K RPM and prescribe that driving to all the owners of my engines.
POST 3Original post
I keep the RPMs up in that range as to never bog the engine when shifting. The M97 engine had a poor design on the piece on top of the oil pressure spring which would whine at 2k rpm. Never heard anything around 3k in either M96 nor M97.
POST 4Original post
Can we hear from Pedro ? I would like to know how he arrived at his theory
POST 5Original post
There could be some truth around the lifters locking and unlocking at certain RPM which could accelerate wear.
POST 6Original post
That is right around the RPM where the variocam+ kicks in and out so I can see not going up and down through that short range constantly. That is the only vibration I've ever heard or felt.
POST 7Original post
At an indicated 79 mph in my 99' C2 my tach is at 3k RPM, and that is usually the speed I drive on the highway. According to my wife's GPS, actual speed is only 74 MPH. My Porsche seems happy at that speed.
POST 8Original post
Quotes source post: 10502545
Lifters lock?
POST 9Original post
Quotes source post: 10503030
Variocam Plus intake lifters operate at two levels. I believe 3mm and 11mm depending on RPM. See below @0:52 onward pin shown as red/green for locking tappet. (gosh that robot voice is hard to listen to....) Porsche Variocam Plus Valve Timing - YouTube
POST 10Original post
Quotes source post: 10502318
Think this arose because the resonance flap is activated at 3K rpms and then deactivated at 3K on the way down. Going up one might notice a bit of the engine coming 'on cam'. Going down there can be a bit of engine reaction. It is hard to describe and my experience is the behavior depends upon other things like the road surface. Seems like on smoother roads the reaction is more pronounced which suggests to me it is a factor of engine and drive train harmonics more than anything related to the resonance flap. VarioCam timing changes and low lift take place at lower 1400 (or thereabouts) rpms and timing only at IIRC 5K rpms. Anyhow, I've driven my 02 Boxster lots of miles and sometimes 3K rpms in 5th gear is just perfect. While I pay no particular attention I suspect the engine has spent hours over the years operating at 3K rpms. With no ill effects I can detect.
POST 11 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
Yep. I know the vario-cam plus effects -- particularly under light throttle. But I've never felt nor heard anyone else talk about inherent harmonic issues. Some small airplanes have small RPM ranges noted on the tach that you avoid because of harmonics. So, the concept isn't new....but just seems confused or misguided when applied to the M96/M97 engines.
POST 12Original post
Its more commonly known as "gimbal lock" and the 996 will tumble off into blown engine space. Seriously, the safest RPM is "0".
POST 13Original post
Thanks for that Macster. I had forgotten about the resonance flap! That makes more sense. I'm surprised it has such a pronounced effect, but then, I guess that's why they put it in. I don't remember where I thought I read that VC+ occurred at around 3k, but I swear that's been circulating around for a bit.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.