POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
Marc G, I believe that this thread rates a permanent Sticky at the top of the 996 Forum!
8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHStuff you didn't know about your 996
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
POST 2Original post
+1, but can you delete all my OT comments first
POST 3Original post
Just what I was thinking. Distill it down to a list--most of them are one-liners.
POST 4Original post
Quotes source post: 6982106
No can do Ed, you are officially the class clown Just delete your post
POST 5Original post
Quotes source post: 6982099
Good idea, who wants to edit it all into a few posts so we lose all the goofy stuff, not that I don't enjoy the goofy stuff, especially Ed's!
POST 6Original post
LOL, if you remove ALL my "goofy" comments I will be a newbie again Mark (Thuunder), at my job, if you make a suggestion... you own it. Looks like you had better get the copy and paste buttons warmed up
POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
Quotes source post: 6982215
LOL! Heck I just spent the last 12 minutes reading that thread and looking for my post from this morning, and thinking that Marc G had deleted it for some reason. LOL! THEN, I see this thread and.. "Oh!, There it is!" LOL! If Marc G moved my post and made it its own thread, or I accidentally hit the POST TOPIC thread instead of REPLY this morning, I have no clue. I don't mind being the guy who edits the original thread, but it may lose some of its... umm... charm (like Ed) if I did that. I think we can tolerate the OT stuff (and Ed, LOL!) and just keep it rolling. But I also think it should be a Sticky since the stuff posted there so far is absolutely great info for Newbies and Oldbies alike, is frequently searched, or asked, or Enzo'd, and this thread should not be allowed to eventually settle into the abyss as folks run out of new stuff or interest, or are distracted by a shiny thing or a taco...
POST 8Original post
Tacos are not shiny but they are distracting
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.