YOUR RESEARCHNEW CAI ADVERT
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Saw this on 6speedonline. Although it seems for the TT, they do mention for C2 also? Based on all the for/against posts lately on CAI's, this may stir up some comments! http://6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=94512
The math does not add up. 412 HP and 428 foot lbs of torque before and 421 HP and 423 Foot lbs after. I wonder what the margin of error is on a dyno like that.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
