POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
http://youtu.be/i3GXpKRTCIw
21 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHThis may be a repost, then again maybe not.
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 21 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
21 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T133652Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
POST 2Original post
I may have commented on this already, then again maybe not.
POST 3Original post
I should click on that link, but.....then again maybe not
POST 4Original post
I'm seriously thinking about doing that mod...but maybe not.
POST 5Original post
Quotes source post: 8577841
fixed
POST 6Original post
Quotes source post: 8577915
... maybe not
POST 7Original post
You guys are all a bunch of smart a**es. Or maybe not. -td
POST 8Original post
or then again maybe not
POST 9Original post
Alright that really hurt my feelings, but then again maybe not
POST 10Original post
OK... this has been discussed before somewhat.... https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...o-a-996-a.html but then again maybe not
POST 11Original post
I... I clicked... on the link... I didn't mean to. It just sort of happened. I had clicked that link years ago but was repelled quickly by the sight of 928's, 914's, and early aircooled 911's. There weren't any 996's there... before... So ummm I kept clicking I couldn't help myself No IMS worries My already devalued 996, made faster? No problem. Drive 996 until the IMS blows. Then... ... I'll get the model numbers from the rear of a 968 - two sets - and make my car a 998 I have owned many a modified Porsche. Even a full on 356 Outlaw. 996 Outlaw No more IMS fears. Just keep it all stock until this one blows... 430HP Yummmmmm Wow. I coulda hadda V8 still can. Yeah, I'm your Huckleberry... Guess I'm out of the closet on this one
POST 12Original post
Should I or not....
POST 13Original post
Quotes source post: 8580022
That's the strangest Haiku I've ever read.
POST 14Original post
I'm under the assumption that without further research this could potentially become a repost but without clicking on the button I really cannot estimate the odds that it is. So maybe it's a repost, but then again it might not be. It all depends on that one little click. But I just can't do it, or maybe it's that I don't want to.
POST 15Original post
I want to vomit, but I hope not. It should disappear, but probably will not.
POST 16Original post
Best thread ever. Or, maybe not.
POST 17Original post
I don't know if I read this or not..........still trying figure out why we are still here after May 21st!
POST 18Original post
Quotes source post: 8583022
You are. We're not.
POST 19Original post
When my M96 motor blows I'll put a remanned beetle engine in, at least then it will be reliable.
POST 20Original post
I do not endorse that mod but it does seem well executed, or..maybe not.
POST 21Original post
I thought I was indecisive but now I'm not so sure?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.