See other post.
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDelete please - double post.
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T165639Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Weird. Please delete. Double post. C.
Oh Chad, now you're getting into "double speak?" Come on guys, I know we can push this thread to at least two pages. Hell, we did that and some on the "Disregard Thread."
Scary Tim - I was thinking the same thing when I saw the title. The "Disregard Thread" started on a Friday IIRC, so alcohol may have helped.
Chad, just go to the thread tools drop down and select CLOSE THREAD.
Quotes source post: 5524912
That would just be too easy!
I likey
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
