YOUR RESEARCHX51 and RMS?
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T173940Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The 996 has grown on me and I am at this moment looking for an opportunity that fits my budget. I am looking for a 2002 or later. I have understood that the RMS seems to be an issue that is not as widespread as it looks (maybe I just want to see it that way...) but it still a concern and will most certainly make me buy with extended warantee. I wonder if the X51 (345 hp powerkit) makes the engine less prone to RMS failures? Thanks for help Jan
"I wonder if the X51 (345 hp powerkit) makes the engine less prone to RMS failures?" nope, same risk same basic engine
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
