Watch this video for a cool way for some different displays on your 996. You Tube Mark
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew Cool Feature We All Have
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T103553Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Been known for awhile now. Neat, but redundant.
Yep, old news. It ONLY works for the 996.1 btw...
Quotes source post: 17192599
Well that explains why I couldn't get it to come up!
ooooh, for those of us that have the .1 and have not seen this before, this looks interesting. Thanks for sharing jb
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
