I would like to take this opportunity to publicly apologize to my �99 c2 - affectionately know as �Jude� Jude, I�m sorry for the laceration I caused on your rear bumper this evening. I shouldn�t have driven you today knowing full well a MN blizzard was in the forecast. But, you have always been so faithful to me. We�ve been through a MN winter previously. We survived unscathed! Neither of us knew the overpass was whiteout conditions. You need input from me and I was blind to the ruts that pulled us into the shoulder. Knowing full well we only had 6 inches between you and the guardrail I made the executive decision to not abandon you and try to get us unstuck. We rocked and rocked. Finally, you broke free! You saved us from certain peril. I�m sorry for allowing the guardrail to come into contact with your pristine backside during the rocking. I promise I will fix you soon. Thank you for always being there for me, Jude. Please forgive me.
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPublic apology to my 99 c2 (Jude)
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Take a sad song and make it better
If you would like to make it up to Jude, I have a nice 99 rear bumper available. PM if interested.
Quotes source post: 17115261
silver?
Had to work tonight and these were some of the worst road conditions I've seen in years. Zero visibility. Any exposed pavement was smooth ice from freezing rain earlier. City streets unplowed with multiple cars stuck at every intersection. I had the fun idea to drive a former Boxster through the winter with snow tires and hardtop. Fine until the snow exceeded 4" then forget it. Winter life is much easier with a 6sp S4 and Nokians
Yikes. Amazing one can even contemplate driving a 911 in such conditions. Goes to show these cars are more capable than other sports cars. The right tires do matter of course. Summer extreme performance tires would be a disaster.
Quotes source post: 17115269
I can answer for Kris, it is Artic Silver from a 99 cabriolet.
Quotes source post: 17116489
Blizzaks work very well in snow. Not so much on ice - but what does? Very capable cars indeed.
Quotes source post: 17115714
4� Spot on! Just a plow after that.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.