I have an engine that had the good old thrust failure, it has damage on the carrier in the thrust area. I believe I could press it back into service, but at this point if I can just replace it I will. 1996 C2 3.4, 5 chain. I have a line on a carrier but the part numbers on the casting are wrong. The original engine carrier part numbers are 996 101 111 3R and 996 101 112 3R The carrier I'm looking at are 996 101 157 2R and 996 101 158 2R I have another carrier from a 2004 C4S with 996 101 157 3R and 996 101 158 3R I'd have to fully spec it out, but the width of the carrier is the same as the original out of the '99 C2. I can't use this one as it belongs to someone else. Does anyone know why the difference in part numbers?
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCrank carrier part numbers? Difference?
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T181445Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Measuring the 3.6 996 101 157 2R carrier found the crank journals/saddles (3.6) are much larger. I don't know if the 2R and 3R makes the difference, or the seller of the 2R carrier just doesn't know what car the carrier is out of. I've asked this seller to measure the journals.
The 3.6 and even the later 3.4 (987c) engines have Larger main bearing diameters. You need a carrier from a 3.4 M96.01,.02, .04 engine code for the 996 application. Box Ster S uses the same carrier in the M96.21 & M96.24 engine, and Boxster base uses it in the M96.22
Thanks Jake. For the 3.4 is there a date they started with the larger journals or is this a typical *****-nilly middle of production change?
I've got one but I'm in uk!
Quotes source post: 14463362
Yes, the 9x7 3.4 has the larger journals, the same as a 3.6L. These started with the 2006 Cayman S, and 2007 Boxster S (M97.21)
Jake - thank you for sharing your knowledge! And, we are sending a hurricane to you. Watch out.....
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
