YOUR RESEARCHDigital camera
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have a friend who's selling his digital camera. He's only just bought it, but he's recently been admitted to hospital with fairly serious injuries and won't be out for ages, so he doesn't need it. To give you an idea of the quality of the camera he's given me a copy of the last photo he took.
Plating, we're not falling for your bull...or is that a falling bull?
What kinda shape is the camera in???
that's one curious looking bull...
IMHO this is an incredible photo. Joking aside, it is real art. This is real life with perspective. You can see the fear in the bull's eyes while at the same time the pathetic enjoyment of the crowd torturing it. As it happens, I don't think the digital image (photo quality) is that good. Too bright, not enough blue and very slightly out of focus. But the photo content is fantastic. It's the sort of work that Photographer Martin Parr would be interested in. http://www.martinparr.com/
Tell us the make and model # of the camera, then we may make some suggestions!!!
Looks to me to be a video capture, not taken with a still camera, especially given the number of horizontal pixels in the picture... I agree though, would need to know the make and model of the video camera to make suggestions...
now we know why he's injured...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
