For three years JD Power and associates has been evaluating the most reliable automobiles in various classes. Once again the Porsche 996 gets an award- This year it is- "The Most Dependable Premium Sport Car". However, it does not stop there- if you look at the <a href="http://www.jdpa.com/presspass/pr/images/2003050afull.gif" target="_blank">JD Power and Associates study and stack ranking of the 2003 Vehicle Dependability Study </a> Porsche Cars North America had the least problems per every 100 vehicles it manufactured. The industry average of problems per every 100 cars is 273 and the stack ranking is as follows (if you have not visited the link above)- Porsche Cars North America- 193 <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" /> Toyota Motor Sales USA (Lexus inclusive)- 196 American Honda Motor - 215 Nissan Motor America- 258 BMW- 258 GM Corp- 264 Subaru of America- 266 (Below Indusrty Average) <img border="0" alt="[crying]" title="" src="graemlins/crying.gif" /> Ford Motor (Jaguar included)- 287 DaimlerChrysler (Mercs Benz Included)- 311 Mitsubishi Motors N.A.- 339 Hyundai Motor America- 342 American Isuzu Motors- 368 Volkswagen of America- 378 American Suzuki Motor Corp- 403 Daewoo Motor America- 421 Kia Motors America- 509 Just another reason from me to run to the garage and look at my 996 and admire it. Porsche...there simply is no substitute! <img src="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/996C4012.JPG" alt=" - " />
JD Powers and Associates study ranks Porsche 996 number 1...again
Add to repair workspace
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHJD Powers and Associates study ranks Porsche 996 number 1...again
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 1 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
1 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.