fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Wait, I thought I cars were supposed to be problematic?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWait, I thought I cars were supposed to be problematic?

1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

Insufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T175704Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I guess not... <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2003/07/08/pf/autos/bc.autos.durability/index.htm?cnn=yes" target="_blank">http://money.cnn.com/2003/07/08/pf/autos/bc.autos.durability/index.htm?cnn=yes</a> Not that any of us mind them breaking anyway <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />

POST 2Original post

Hmmm ... JD Powers ... this might just be a measure of how much a car company is willing to kiss ***. When I was on the factory floor in Stuttgart, I noticed a car tagged as a JD Powers car. Presumably this car got a lot of special attention. IMHO this is not the way a car should be judged on quality.

POST 3Original post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by pete01_996: <strong>...When I was on the factory floor in Stuttgart, I noticed a car tagged as a JD Powers car...</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica"><img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />

POST 4Original post

Nice piece of info. to throw around in a conversation, thanx. Actually my wife is going to hear about it first, another reason why you should buy a porsche too honey

POST 5Original post

Obviously, the grass IS NOT greener on the other side of the hill!

POST 6Original post

Who do you believe, JD Powers or Consumer Reports?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.