I was reading the Autoweek that had the reader and non-reader survey that rated the 911 as the best sports car. I didn't ever see the survey though so I have a couple of questions. 1) The picture in the article was a C4S and the article said the GT2 and GT3 were in a different category. Does that mean the C4S was the best 911 among C2/C4S/Cab/TT or does it simply mean that was the picture they chose? (Best looking maybe? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> ) I never saw the survey so I don't know how granular it was. 2) Did the survey only have certain cars you could choose from or could you also write in answers? 3) Is is possible to see the whole survey results? I'm curious as to what were the top 10 sports cars or the top 10 exotics, etc, beyond just the top 3 or 5 mentioned in the article. 4) Who is making the special edition "Best Sports Car in America" license plate frames for our 911's? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> Put me down for one... <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" />
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAutoweek Survey Question?
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 1 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
1 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T140027Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.