OK - Can you folks help out a fellow Rennlist Member on the e-mail lists??? Below is his post - and I've already exceeded my votes ... I'm about to post back to the 914 e-mail list and tell him to "Watch This - I just posted to the 944 Forum" In Short - GO HERE: <a href="http://www.timesonline.com" target="_blank">http://www.timesonline.com</a> and click on the "Baby/Vote here" button in the right side of the page. AND VOTE FOR BABY #8. If Greg's Nephew Wins - I'm sending him a T'Shirt from Rennlist - and IMPRINTING it with the Rennlist 924/931/944/951/968 Forum Logo... No kidding..! Let's get that baby started off right....!!! Here is Greg's post: Hey guys, Thanks for all the votes from everyone so far. We have successfully taken over first place, BUT it is a very tight race. Currently, my nephew Gavin (aka Baby #8) has 140 votes to second place Baby#9's 138. It is a very tight race, and I need your help. I know there are are just a few more than 140 rennlisters... which mean some of you haven't voted... I respect your time and acknowledge that most of you have better things to do. As for me, I do too. I'm covered up at work, BUT I have this hankerin' (That's a synonym for "NEED" for those of you not from the south) for my nephew to blow this thing wide open. I appreciate all that have already voted! Anyone that wants to vote can at <a href="http://www.timesonline.com" target="_blank">http://www.timesonline.com</a> and click on the "Baby/Vote here" button. My nephew is #8. Thanks again. This will be my last request, but I will send an update when it's over.
(OT)Help out a future rennlister and vote! please read
Add to repair workspace
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH(OT)Help out a future rennlister and vote! please read
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T064914Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Ok, I voted. Baby8 is pulling away! BTW Tabo I tried to get some pics of Silver Bullet from your website and pics didn't open. I'm collecting pics of silver Pcars (have over 500). If you didn't send some already could you email me a profile and a couple others. TIA
Done
And this is related to 996's how???
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.