YOUR RESEARCHCar and parts pics
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Right after I bought my car I took it in to RUF for L&N IMS, RMS, 997 WP and only got a chance to post one photo. So I just got it back and promised more pics. Here is my Meridian Metallic 2001 C4 and the old parts that came out of it. I was pumped that it had the double row IMS bearing.
very nice
Nice!
Nice shine and lots of new parts.
Looks real good. Geat color. If you look at my sig, I have had rougly the same items done over the past 2.5 years of ownership. Happy motoring!
@Porsche87 - "I was pumped that it had the double row IMS bearing." Welcome and congrats on a beautiful car! Can you explain this comment please?
Thanks everyone for the comments. sovarystout it looks like you had just about the same thing done, glad to see that and its working out. Don't want to turn this into an IMS thread but to answer your question Bill, according to the L&N Engineering website, they have experienced zero failures with the dual row bearing retrofit. They have had only a few with the single row bearing. http://www.lnengineering.com/ims.html
Starting to see failures of LNE bearings within 3 years? Hmmm.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
