POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post
http://www.autoblog.com/entry/1234000547071013/
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH2002 996 tops resale value
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T094842Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
POST 2Original post
Thanks! Glad mine's a 02.
POST 3Original post
That article was only looking at 2002 MY vehicles.
POST 4Original post
"Finally, we narrowed the field to cars that reward in combined doses of performance, design, engineering, and character. That gives us a nice variety of please most automotive tastes. " Looks like there was a lot of pre-judging involved. If you read the article, they weeded out a lot of cars based on their own subjective criteria. Only after that did they judge the relative resale values of the cars. It would be nice if they gave a full list of ALL the cars they judged, rather than just the top 6 that they considered winners.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.