fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Minor tire size question

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHMinor tire size question

1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

Insufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Why, on the 18" rims did Porsche go with 285/30's on the C2's but 295/30's on the C4's (and turbo's I guess)? Obviously, 295/30 is a better match in overall diameter compared to the 225/40's in front (.4 of 225 is 90, .3 of 295 is 88.5, .3 of 285 is 85.5? I mean, the difference's in handling and final ratio are going to be pretty small, the 295 is a nominal 0.4, inches wider and a whopping 1/8 taller, so it's pretty unnoticeable, EXCEPT that with 295's you'd get a little bit more rim protection, and they look nicer. I've owned the same size tires from a few different makers and Dunlops width is totally different than Michelins, which is different from Bridgestones, so THAT variation along is much greater than a single 10mm increase in width. Is the difference in understeer that much that such a small difference makes that much difference?

POST 2Original post

Porsche specs the same tires on the C2 and the C4. The C4S gets different tires because it has a "turbo" body and thus significantly different weight, track, and exterior dimensions from the other cars.

POST 3Original post

And the rear wheel on the C4S is 11" wide rather than the 10" rear on C2 and C4.

POST 4Original post

Quotes source post: 5328865

Frankly, I'm wondering if it's not just cosmetic. Bigger fenders, bigger wheels to fill them out.

POST 5Original post

Quotes source post: 5330927

The wide body factor is certainly a major part of the appeal of the C4S. Porsche probably chose to build the C4S on the Turbo platform (rather than C4) precisely for the wide body styling, because it would be more visually distinct from the C2 and C4, and therefore worthy of a price bump and increased profit. Not to mention the cost effective ease of conversion: just take out the expensive dry sump Turbo 3.6 and drop in a standard 3.6. However, the Turbo's wide body is certainly not cosmetic, as it houses the intercoolers, and needless to say, the additional rear wheel width is helpful putting down the additional power. But back to your question....... What's the first comment usually made about the C4S? It's great looks.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.