Hi J.D., I ordered some up to my hotel room from Sacramentoskyranch.com. Can't wait to get this stuff back to the UK and on to my car. Funny experience though: when I rang your office in Texas, I spoke to a`real nice lady. It surprised me to learn that this stuff is not called Rejex (read redjex) as I thought. No sir, it's got 3 sylabals......she said "Reeeeyeeejex" in good Texan form. Lol. Luv it. Cheers, Berny
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHFunny
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T070717Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Big oops! I clocked post new topic not post reply in the rejex thread. Sooorreeey
No Texan would have made that mistake. That's a funny story though. Gotta love the twang.
I was serious!
on the topic of funny, here's a good one I got today: Stephen Spielberg is casting for a new film based around the great > composers. > > Anyway to give the film a twist and some 'oomph' he decides to cast the > parts to the great action heroes of today. He calls Stallone, Arnie, > Bruce Willis and Seagal into his office to hear who they would like to > play: > > "Well," started Stallone, "I've always admired Mozart. I would love to > play him." > > "Chopin has always been my favourite, and my image would improve if > people saw me playing the piano" said Willis. "I'll play him." > > "I've always been partial to Strauss and his waltzes," said Segal. "I'd > like to play him." > > Spielberg was very pleased with these choices. "Sounds splendid." Then, > looking at Schwarzenegger, he asked, "Who do you want to be, Arnold?" So > Arnold says ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "I'll be Bach." Have a nice day!
cheese......serious cheese
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
