Can anyone help these guys out? http://www.pca-gr.de/ Sounds like PCA is doing crap for it's members overseas. harrY
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhat the F***??
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Sounds like junk. Wonder what the deal is?
Something about it on the general porsche discussion forum... https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...hreadid=134557
As a PCA member, it seems unfair regardless of the region, to be treated that way when they are paying their dues as well. We as members of PCA should demand better response and fairness from PCA HQ.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
