Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T031046Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Honestly. I think that is a computer rendering and not a real body kit that exists. The rendering thing gets lots of press and is all the rage right now.
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/j...it-149073.html
It looked like one of the wild veilside kits of the late 90s and my veilside 996 search led me there.
My first thought when I saw that photo was "Toyota". Japan makes some fugly cars. Their idea of a super car is a cross between a sneaker and 1970's robot monster.
READ the ARTICLE. As I said rendering and not a real build. That means no one can buy it. You could make it or have it made, but there is no kit to buy.
