Since one of the gripes about this forum is that it's getting cluttered with non-technical discussion, would it be possible to create a subforum (like the politics and controversy subforum for OT) to post new 996-related but non-technical threads, and to migrate stuff like "should I trade my 996 for a Ford Festiva and $26 in Dave and Busters gift cards"? While I richly enjoy contributing to nonsense threads, I have to agree that content is getting hit-or-miss. Having 996-related discussions is awesome, but having them separated from the actual technical Q&A and DIYs would help keep the forum cleaned up without cracking down on non-technical posts that keep the 996 forum interesting... If this is a terrible idea, feel free to ban me for a couple of hours.
Mods, how about a subforum for general 996-related threads
Add to repair workspace
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMods, how about a subforum for general 996-related threads
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T144035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Ban him. He dared you. If we are doing a subforum, I want a Penthouse Forum section (you know, for the boobie threads). Can we get a subforum dedicated to threads containing the phrase "poopy pants"?
Dear Penthouse Forums, I never believed this would happen to me... It wasn't a dare, per se...
Schnell tread lightly. I got a temporary ban for suggesting the 996 sub-forum idea. Funny story now.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.