YOUR RESEARCHFirst Auto-x and pics
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Well, after having my car only a week, I decided to take it out and flog it around an auto-x. Boy what a blast. Much different than my Mustangs. I ran SK1 (street tire indexed class) and ended up mid pack of the 22 cars. My brother who auto-x's all the time creamed me by getting a 77.xxx to my 79.xxx. Sorry for the low-res/low quality pics, they were done with my camera phone in the pits.
Sounds like you had fun. Welcome to your new addiction. Pete
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
