Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T053112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
From a letter in today's
Wall Street Journal
, written by Don Mauch of Norwell, Massachusetts:
Excessive horsepower and a rear-mounted engine together with a lightweight front is a recipe for disaster...[.]
What's he talking about?
Lawn mowers
.
Last week,
WSJ
($) carried an article about the popularity of zero turn-radius riding
mowers
. In today's paper, Mr. Mauch explains that he gave his up because it wrecked his lawn: "If your lawn is essentially flat, your grass a few inches high and absolutely dry most of the time, then go for it. Otherwise, stick with the tried and true [regular mower]."
It's a comparison I never thought would occur, but there it is.
Don't lift in a turn and your lawn will be fine.
roflmao...there was an episode of King Of the Hill where they had 2 goto a focus group where the lawnmower company was demoing their new Zero-Turning Radius mower. Hank Pwns them with his mighty redneck logic.
