fullymatted.
Back to search
Carpokes

996 horsepower

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH996 horsepower

1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

Insufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Carpokes: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I’m curious why the 2002 996 is listed with 320 hp and the 2003 is listed with 315. The engine is unchanged as far as i know. Can someone enlighten me?

POST 2Original post

Where are you seeing it listed differently? All the places I found list them both as 320? Maybe you saw a site that listed power in a different rating standard...? https://www.stuttcars.com/porsche-911-c ... rformance/ https://www.stuttcars.com/porsche-911-c ... rformance/ https://www.excellence-mag.com/resources/specs/63 https://www.excellence-mag.com/resources/specs/65

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Edmunds says 315. Motor Trend says 320

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Car and Driver also says 315.

POST 6Original post

Ok, I see the discrepancies now. Can't really explain why some sites list it as 315 (or 316) rather than 320, but suspect it is not a coincidence that 320 metric horsepower (PS) is equal to 315.52 imperial horsepower (HP). Porsche itself just says 320PS for '02 - '4 on its site (at least for models where it lists a horsepower rating -- targa, C4, etc.). So, I'd be all ready to chalk it up to metric vs. imperial HP, but Porsche itself adds to the confusion by listing the M96.03 motor with slightly different KW levels in its parts catalog (232KW for the '02, and 235KW for the '03, which translates to 315.4 metric horsepower, and 319.5 metric horsepower, respectively). Since the sales brochures and Porsche's current website list 320PS for all '02 to '04 (as far as I could see anyway), my pure guess would be that the engineering department and marketing department didn't compare memos and created the confusion. Rated horsepower numbers are as much art as science, so again just a guess but this could be just a rating update by the engineers for the same M96.03 motor, whereas the official (advertised) rating was always 320PS. But that's just speculation. From PET.... pet hp ratings.jpg (1.17 MiB) Viewed 1153 times

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks! Clear as mud now. Just know my ‘03 has plenty of power to scare me at times.

POST 8Original post

Quotes source post: 30375

Awesome research and fact-finding Tom. Enlightening, for sure!

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Tom- Thank you for wading through this and finding the answer to my somewhat trivial question. As a recent Porsche purchaser I’m sure I’ll have lots of questions. Nice to know there’s an easy and friendly resource available. Doug

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.