Interesting to see elswhere that Porsche sales of 911 & Boxter have dropped dramatically in the states, whilst the Cayenne has sold boatloads. I think we all knew the Cayenne would be a goer, just look at the number of 4x4' s on the road (particularly in the states) & add in Porkers prestige badge..SOLD. But I think the 911 & Boxter sales also tell a tale (appreciating that they also have a recession over there & the current range is now relatively old !!) the latest facelifts were very conserative particularly on the Boxter & the competition has played catch up. The new Z4 for example looks great & drives very well for less money, I' m no BMW fan but it' s true. The " S" is much better but about £10k more !! We now also have a fleet of Merc' s & Audi' s that can keep up with (at least on the straights) or go faster than the 996TT let alone the rest of the Porker range. I know there is much more to drivers car than just power & I love my car (& certainly don' t hanker after an AMG) but I think Porsche MUST look carefully at the 997, which is still just another facelift in reality. I for one don' t want to step back in time to the 993 look they are suggesting, been there, seen & done that !! I would like to see a sleek modern design alla Carrera V10, the boxter with 300hp plus (easily done) C2' s with 400 & the Turbo up to 500+ with ceramic brakes as standard on the TT & the current TT brakes on the other 996' s. Porkers have always been seen as the pinacle of high performance motoring, long may this be so. Rant over !!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT DO YOU THINK ??????????????????????
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPorkers... future what do you think
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 1 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
1 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.