YOUR RESEARCHcheck these records for 986 I'm considering
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm considering this 2001 986 and just got what appear to be the complete service records. If anyone knows more than I do (that's all of you), and if you don't mind, could you please take a look and tell me what you think? There seem to have been some issues along the way. I'm not sure these are red flags, or if I should be happy they've been identified and remedied. Thanks for any input.
I'm guessing you re-posted hoping to get more responses? You have to have patience around here unless you ask about your 996. 😁🤣 It's just the way it rolls.
Different forum on a different site. But thanks for looking out for me.
Different forum on a different site. But thanks for looking out for me.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
