Given the Mileage and the Evocation Quite a lower reserve which suggests there is a bit more work needed for this car ? Lot 197 - 2003 Porsche 911/996 Turbo GT2 Evocation Lot 197 - 2003 Porsche 911/996 Turbo GT2 Evocation www.historics.co.uk Lot details Year: 2002 Make: Porsche Model: 911/996 Turbo GT2 Evocation Registration: MK02 FAA Chassis No: WP0ZZZ99Z25681898 Odometer: 195,750 Approximately £107,000 of maintenance invoices since 2009! In current ownership for 17 years Upgraded with GT2 cosmetic parts Manual gearbox
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHOver £107,000 of maintenance bills
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- 911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Sounds like a heap of trouble. The original reg of R666 NCB has the MOT detail.
The R666 reg comes up as incorrect for me.. However the details against the MK02 number dont present a car that was cherished that well...
It's probably mid change over on the DVLA. Yes, the history would put me off.
Just about run in at 190k miles....
Anyone that puts those folding Temu seats in their car should be shot...and in a GT2 'make up some word that sounds racey' car, should be paraded naked with around Stuttgart before being shot! God forbid what the wing and bumper are made of
Rust visible around both headlights on the GT2 evocation , never seen that before. Rear wing and air intakes look to be painted in Halfords Black Satin (in the carpark) To think £107k + the original Turbo could have bought a mint real GT2
WTF are those seats as for the headline, not sure having of £000's of maintenance is a good sign did he include every fuel receipt ?
Did they ask chatgpt how to make "replica" sound more expensive? WTF is an evocation.
Quotes source post: 2803685
Good spot
These people that put GT badges on their non-GT cars …. The most defensive of all as well, usually
Quotes source post: 2803715
No Not a great return on investment if it’s stays in the guide price
Looks like a dogs dinner, Temu GT2?
It must be salvageable, right? Maybe a project for someone. Get those GT badges off, put some sensible seats in, would be a good start.
Quotes source post: 2803987
exactly, there is a good bodywork base for this restoration
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
