Well I did it....on my way to Wales on Friday of last week I went via the mecca of the midlands...there were lots of rallings in bright colours and graffiti on the side of police stations and the unautherised dealer who was meant to meet me ignored my calls which was a little worrying..but it all eventually went through smoothly and I handed over the keys to my throughly loved and abused 120K GTI for the Basalt Black 996C2 WReg. She's so damn sexy. I came down with the damn Blair Syndrom...My cheeks were starting to ache after an hour I was grinning so much.I have to say it has amazing pulling power :wink: There is one piece of MAJOR equipment I got before I handed over my readies for the porker though....and that was a V1 it's prevented me 3 times already from being targeted by some unfairly positionsed 'Safety Cameras' cleverly diguised as gastos.It's not failed once on a detection. It's also got the very handy built in VG-A system which prevents those countries where thay don't allow you to have a Radar Detector from detecting you detecting them...if you see what I mean. You wont appear on there units as having a Radar Detector.I've got a brilliant source for getting them at a hugely reduced price. They're direct from the manufacture so all as brand new with the warrenty, manual and all the bits.They retail here at around £550 i can get them shipped for £290 including postage and packaging from the USA within a week.If anyone is interested do drop me an email.JJPs...have a search on the net for the Valentine One. Here is one of the tests that got me purchasing!It has nothing to do with the Snooper system I guess this is just a shop that sells all types. http://www.snooper.co.uk/valentine_one_2001_test.htm postamble(); Migration info. Legacy thread was 16125
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMy new baby and her new toy!
1 matching discussions were examined; no attributable action/outcome evidence was detected. No consensus or repair conclusion is claimed.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Read captured repliesInsufficient extracted evidence does not mean there is no answer in the original discussions.
1 matching discussions · 1 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
1 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
- 911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.